When imputing income is imputed in an original order, can the payor continue to impute income?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from M.H. v. J.E., 2019 ONSC 4317 (CanLII):
When income is imputed in an original order, the payor has the onus of showing why it is not appropriate to continue to impute income: Trang v. Trang, 2013 ONSC 1980.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test to prove that continuation of a support order would be continuation of the order if the support order is not inconsistent or absurd? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a payor be imputed income to the payor if he voluntarily retired to frustrate a material change order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the range of income impute by a judge when it is difficult to impute income to a recipient? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to change income imputed to the payor at the original hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
When will a court order a person to pay child support based on imputed income rather than their actual income? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income from a parent who has been ordered to work to meet his child support obligations? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court dealt with a claim for minimum wage imputing income against the payor? (Ontario, Canada)
When will a court order an interim order to place a temporary order on a temporary parent? (Ontario, Canada)
How is impute income imputed in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
If there is no reasonable excuse for the under-employment of a payor, what is the effect on imputed income? (Ontario, Canada)
