In what circumstances will the Court consider the merits of a hostile work environment claim?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Whitley v. Runyon, 104 F.3d 352 (2nd Cir. 1996):
While we are ordinarily reluctant to consider the merits of claims not addressed by the district court, we are not precluded from doing so in the interests of judicial economy. See, e.g., Dobosz v. Walsh, 892 F.2d 1135, 1140 (2d Cir.1989). This is especially desirable where the issues are clear and have been discussed by an administrative agency. Accordingly, we turn to the merits of the plaintiff's hostile work environment claims.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Before the court examines the merits of First Amendment claim, will the court consider whether this claim is ripe? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When will a plaintiff have to present his claims to the courts in a context in which they would be considered on the merits of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a Fourth Amendment claim in circumstances where the petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved the denial of a full and fair opportunity to litigate that claim in the state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have federal courts interpreted the "last reasoned decision" by a state court addressing the merits of a claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court exercise jurisdiction over constitutional questions when the claim asserted is so attenuated and unsubstantial that the claim is absolutely devoid of merit? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a Fourth Amendment claim in circumstances where the petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved the denial of a full and fair opportunity to litigate that claim in state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
