California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Estevanovich v. City of Riverside, 69 Cal.App.4th 544, 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 684 (Cal. App. 1999):
In a facial challenge to the constitutional validity of an ordinance, the court only considers the text of the measure itself, not its application to particular persons. In a facial challenge there is no need for the taking of evidence regarding the enforcement of the ordinance, since the issue is a [69 Cal.App.4th 565] matter of law as to the ordinance itself. (Tobe v. City of
Page 698
II. Plaintiffs Have Failed to Show That the Ordinance Violated Their Right to Equal Protection Under the Law
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.