The Ontario Court of Appeal in Drygala v. Pauli, supra set out the following three questions which should be answered by a court in considering a request to impute income on the basis of unemployment or under-employment: 1. Is the party intentionally under-employed or unemployed? 2. If so, is the intentional under-employment or unemployment required by virtue of his reasonable educational, the needs of the child or reasonable health needs? 3. If not, what income is appropriately imputed?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.