California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Padilla, 11 Cal.4th 891, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 426, 906 P.2d 388 (Cal. 1995):
For closely similar reasons, defendant's alternate claim that defense counsel himself was negligent in failing to request an other-crimes limiting [11 Cal.4th 951] instruction under CALJIC No. 2.50 also fails. As in People v. Bunyard, supra, 45 Cal.3d 1189, 249 Cal.Rptr. 71, 756 P.2d 795, here also the possibility that such an instruction, had it been requested and given, would have led to a
Page 463
2. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at the penalty phase.
a. Failure effectively to present "lingering doubt" defense.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.