When will a jury consider a defendant's claim that trial counsel ineffective for failing to request a limiting instruction regarding the baseball bat incident?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Shackelford, H038811 (Cal. App. 2014):

We also reject defendant's claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a limiting instruction regarding the baseball bat incident. First, the baseball bat incident was admitted for impeachment purposes, not as other crimes evidence under Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b), so an instruction such as CALCRIM No. 375 (evidence of uncharged offenses to prove identity, intent, common plan, etc.) would not have been appropriate. Second, "the decision not to request one was a reasonable tactical choice by defense counsel to avoid directing the jury to focus on the evidence [of the baseball bat incident]." (People v. Ferraez (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 925, 934.) Third, as explained above, the evidence of defendant's guilt of first degree murder was overwhelming and thus, even if trial counsel had requested a limiting instruction concerning the baseball bat incident, we conclude the jury would still have reached a first degree murder verdict.

Page 31

Other Questions


Is a defendant's claim that his trial counsel's failure to object or request a limiting instruction was ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant's claim that defense counsel negligent in failing to request an other-crimes limiting instruction under CALJIC No.50 fails, what are the consequences? (California, United States of America)
Is there any merit to a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a jury instruction on the defense of accident? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with ineffective assistance claims against counsel who failed to request a limiting instruction? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's trial counsel ineffective for failing to request a factually and legally unsupported instruction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel against counsel who failed to follow up with follow-up questions? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant makes a motion for a continuance of trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, is it appropriate to appoint a new counsel to prepare the motion? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the Attorney General's contention that a defendant forfeited any claim of error by failing to object or request modification to an instruction in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to succeed in a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.