Given the substantive and procedural commonalities raised in the two petitions; the fact that the same parties are involved; the risk of inconsistent findings on identical issues arising out of the same factual matrix; and the time saving that will be achieved through a joint proceeding, hearing the petitions together within the circumstances of this case makes sense. See Hui v. Hoa, 2012 BCSC 1045 at paras. 33–35.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.