How will the Court of Appeal interpret the implied findings of fact made by a trial court in support of an order?

In Murray v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.2d 611, 619, 284 P.2d 1, it is said that an appellate court will not disturb the implied findings of fact made by a trial court in support of an order, any more than it will interfere with express findings upon which a final judgment is predicated; that when the evidence is conflicting, it will be presumed that the court found every fact necessary to support its order that the evidence would justify; that so far as it has passed on the weight of the evidence, its implied findings are conclusive; and that this rule is equally applicable whether the evidence is oral or documentary.

Page 598