Does a judge have the authority to determine whether substantial evidence supported the implied findings of a trial court order?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Pleasant v. Self (In re Conservatorship of Pers. & Estate of O.T.), C088321 (Cal. App. 2019):
determine whether substantial evidence supported the implied findings underlying the trial court's order"]; Christie v. Kimball (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1407, 1412 ["[w]e cannot presume error from an incomplete record"].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a fee order under review is ordered by a judge other than the trial judge, does the court have any discretion or authority to review the order? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting the finding that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the jury instructions that the trial court relied on in its tentative order and in its final order deny defendant's petition that the jury must find that the killing was committed with either express or implied malice or otherwise implied malice? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated "substantial evidence" in determining whether substantial evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there was substantial evidence to support the jury's implied findings? (California, United States of America)
When determining whether there is substantial evidence to support a conviction, what is the test for substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How will the Court of Appeal interpret the implied findings of fact made by a trial court in support of an order? (California, United States of America)
