How is a claim that jury instructions misstate the elements of a statutory crime reviewed de novo?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Razo, 20-10021 (9th Cir. 2021):

Likewise, when properly preserved below, a claim that jury instructions misstate the elements of a statutory crime is reviewed de novo. United States v. Christensen, 828 F.3d 763, 785 (9th Cir. 2015). Such errors are generally subject to harmless error review. United States v. Thongsy, 577 F.3d 1036, 1040 (9th Cir. 2009).

Other Questions


Does a jury instruction misstated elements of the statutory crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a jury instruction misstated the elements of a statutory crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Whether jury instructions omit or misstate elements of a statutory crime or adequately cover a defendant's proffered defense? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a jury instruction misstate elements of the statutory crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a jury instruction misstate an element of the statutory crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a jury instruction misstated elements of a statutory crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a jury instruction misstated an element of the statutory crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a jury instruction misstate elements of a statutory crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.