How have the courts interpreted the statute of fraud in cases involving fraud claims?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Garter-Bare Co. v. Munsingwear, Inc., 650 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1980):
Appellee asserts that the fifth and sixth claims are barred by the statute of frauds. But under California law the application of the statute of frauds raises fact issues that must be determined by the jury unless only one inference can be drawn from the evidence. Caplan v. Roberts, 506 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir. 1974). We cannot say that there was only one inference in this case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the federal government have an obligation to interpret the bank fraud statute in the same way as the mail fraud statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a federal agency interprets or interprets a statute, does the interpretation or application of the statute need to be reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law supporting a claim that the District Court erred by not remanding an action to state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
