How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Houck v. Sparks, 81 F.3d 168 (9th Cir. 1996):
We review a district court's factual findings for clear error, and its conclusions of law de novo. Brooker v. Desert Hosp. Corp., 947 F.2d 412, 414 (9th Cir.1991).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a claim before the Federal Court of Justice is a motion brought by a plaintiff in a personal injury case brought before the federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal district court in the case of Carter v McCarthy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a federal district court's decision that a plaintiff has been denied access to a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the implications of a federal district court's decision on a motion brought by a plaintiff in a federal civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a diversity action brought by the California Board of Directors, how have the courts interpreted the findings of the federal district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a finding that a defendant is liable for misconduct in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
