California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Mattz v. Superior Court (People), 195 Cal.App.3d 431, 240 Cal.Rptr. 723 (Cal. App. 1987):
These decisions involve general questions of economic regulation and tribal self-sufficiency: not conservation of a precious and finite environmental resource and the state's significant interest in its regulations in furtherance of resource preservation. The first Indian preemption case to approach application of preemption principles in the environmental context was New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, supra, and that case involved questions of general wildlife management rather than urgent questions of conserving a fixed resource of fragile survival potential.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.