How have courts interpreted the principle in Gray v. Hall and what are the implications of that principle?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bristol Convalescent Hospital v. Stone, 258 Cal.App.2d 848, 66 Cal.Rptr. 404 (Cal. App. 1968):
The application of the principle declared in Gray v. Hall, supra, calls for a workable procedural rule because of certain problems that immediately present themselves. Gray v. Hall itself provides no such guidance.
Sections 473, 432 and 586, Code of Civil Procedure, all bear upon the question.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of the Indian Supreme Court and what are the implications of these principles? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the principles defining a trial court's duty to instruct sua sponte on defense? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the principle of law where a new reapportionment plan developed through the legislative process is less unconstitutional than the old one? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted or interpreted the word "or" and "and" in legislation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the principle of equal protection when it comes to providing trial transcripts to indigent defendants on appeal? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
Can a defense interpreter only interpret words of the witness interpreter at trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the estoppel principle as applied to the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
