The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Hawkins, 980 F.2d 739 (9th Cir. 1992):
Hawkins first argues that she was seized by Gillespie before he placed her under arrest, thus invoking the protections of the Fourth Amendment. She contends that Gillespie seized her and conducted an investigatory stop that was not predicated on a founded suspicion, measured under the totality of the circumstances, that she was engaged in criminal activity. See United States v. Mondello, 927 F.2d 1463, 1470 (9th Cir.1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.