The following excerpt is from Farkas v. Williams, 823 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2016):
20 United States v. Redlightning , 624 F.3d 1090, 1103 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting United States v. Kim , 25 F.3d 1426, 1430 (9th Cir. 1994) ). In his complaint, Farkas alleged that the detective also violated his Fourth Amendment rights with a pat-down search, and the district court summarily adjudicated this claim in the detective's favor. On appeal, Farkas concedes that the search was constitutional.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.