How have the courts interpreted statements obtained from a witness in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Palomares, F066360, F066576 (Cal. App. 2017):
statements were obtained in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda). The People contend admission of the statements was not error. We agree with Palomares that the trial court erred in ruling the statements admissible; however, the error was not prejudicial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is the court abused its discretion in refusing to protect a witness in a sexual assault case from the possibility that the prosecution witnesses in the case colluded to corroborate their testimony? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the rules of evidence in cases dealing with self-confessed statements made outside of court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted victim impact statements in civil cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted comments made by a prosecutor in a civil case where the prosecutor suggested that the prosecutor's theories were not the exclusive theories that may be considered by the court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statements by a prosecutor before the jury in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted witness testimony in cases where witnesses have been found not guilty of racial discrimination? (California, United States of America)
