How have the courts dealt with the issue of perjured testimony and ineffective assistance at trial?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Bartholomew v. Wood, 96 F.3d 1451 (9th Cir. 1996):

We now consider the other arguments petitioner made in his habeas petition. Petitioner contends that 1) that the prosecution knowingly presented perjured testimony in violation of Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959); and 2) that he was prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. After considering petitioner's arguments, we find no prejudicial error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court order denying the petition.

Other Questions


Can a federal habeas court rule that ineffective assistance was ineffective assistance in a state petition? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, in what circumstances will the US Supreme Court grant a motion to reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for new trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance an ineffective assistance claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the US Supreme Court dealt with the issue of race discrimination in the context of civil rights issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of conscientious objector claims in the context of local authority issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of jurisdictional issues in this case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with ineffective assistance claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the issue of improper assistance of counsel at a hearing where the issue was fully litigated? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with ineffective assistance of counsel in sentencing cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How will a court review a trial court's decision to exclude testimony from a witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.