How have the courts dealt with ineffective assistance claims?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Amiel v. U.S., 209 F.3d 195 (2nd Cir. 1999):
See Amiel v. United States, No. 98-2135 (2d Cir. Dec. 1, 1998). We vacate the district court's order insofar as it denied appellant's ineffective assistance claim and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts dealt with claims of deficient performance and ineffective assistance claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal habeas court rule that ineffective assistance was ineffective assistance in a state petition? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance an ineffective assistance claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims of ineffective assistance of counsel? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with claims of breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentation, false advertising and unjust enrichment claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed ineffective assistance of counsel claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
