How have courts treated identification issues in medical malpractice cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Osborn, E054387 (Cal. App. 2013):
for identification even when the defendant offered to stipulate to their identity]; People v. Martinez (2003) 31 Cal.4th 673, 692 [two photographs of the victim with some relatives were properly admitted for identification].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated mental health issues in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated medical malpractice in the context of medical malpractices? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the issue of third party payments in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of electronic surveillance in a juvenile court case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the issue of the suspension of a medical student by the medical board? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated medical malpractice cases involving injuries caused by negligence? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated victim impact evidence in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated disclosure of confidential information in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
