How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jones, (Cal. 2013):

There being sufficient evidence to conclude the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in finding Donnelly's testimony was not outside of her expertise within the meaning of Evidence Code section 720, questions about the depth or scope of her knowledge or experience go to the weight, not the admissibility, of her testimony. (People v. Eubanks, supra, 53 Cal.4th at p. 140.)

Other Questions


How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the testimony of a forensic expert in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted expert testimony instructions in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to refuse to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.