How have courts reviewed expert testimony in medical malpractice cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Summers v. A.L. Gilbert Co., 69 Cal.App.4th 1155, 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 162 (Cal. App. 1999):

A trial court's determination that expert testimony is admissible is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 266, 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 377, 841 P.2d 897; People v. Johnson (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 778, 787, 23 Cal.Rptr.2d 703.) Additionally:

Other Questions


In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the testimony of a forensic expert in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted expert testimony instructions in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to refuse to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
Does section 2337 of the Medical Association's Medical Licence Review Guidelines apply to a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.