California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Simon, 1 Cal.5th 98, 204 Cal.Rptr.3d 380, 375 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2016):
We find no abuse of discretion here. (See People v. Brady (2010) 50 Cal.4th 547, 583, 113 Cal.Rptr.3d 458, 236 P.3d 312 [reviewing cumulative effect of victim impact testimony under Evid.Code, 352 for abuse of discretion].) The victim impact evidence was not unduly prejudicial because the testimony did not invite the
[204 Cal.Rptr.3d 417]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.