The following excerpt is from In re Hamanaka, 53 BR 320 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1985):
Gleason v. Thaw, 236 U.S. 558, 35 S.Ct. 287, 59 L.Ed. 717 (1915). In equating custody rights with property rights, plaintiff is suggesting that his children are his property, a rather primitive concept which ignores the special relationship between a parent and child. Authorities uniformly recognize that the parent-child relationship is a "status"
[53 BR 323]
and not a "property right." 67A C.J.S. Parent & Child, 2 (1978); 59 Am.Jur.2d, Parent and Child, 1, (1971).The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.