The following excerpt is from Hydrick v. Hunter, 449 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2006):
Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 933 (9th Cir.2004). Thus, there are two bodies of law from which we might draw "clearly established" law for qualified immunity purposes: first, where the SVPs claim a violation of a right that is clearly established even in the prison context, and second, where the SVPs claim a violation of a right that is clearly established for all civilly detained persons.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.