How have courts interpreted pension legislation in the context of pension legislation?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Sawyer v. Sonoma County, 719 F.2d 1001 (9th Cir. 1983):
10 In Gorman v. Cranston, 64 Cal.2d 441, 50 Cal.Rptr. 533, 413 P.2d 133 (1966), the court held that pension legislation must be liberally construed and applied to the end that the beneficial results of such legislation may be achieved.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted agency interpretation in the context of national security legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted federal legislation in the context of constitutional interpretation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "imminence" in the context of environmental protection legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted motor vehicle legislation in the context of the motor vehicle accident law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the doctrine of federal jurisdiction in the context of the federal courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the free exercise clause of the First Amendment in the context of religious freedom legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted interpretative regulations in the context of the communications industry? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a public service agreement in the context of communications security legislation? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
