How have courts interpreted the term "maliciously" in the context of the definition of the offence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Anderson, A149546 (Cal. App. 2019):
Finally, appellant's contention that the trial court erred in failing to define the term "maliciously" as used in the jury instruction defining this offense was rejected in People v. Adams (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1486, because "the term 'maliciously' as used in
Page 17
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the statutory language of the Sexual Offences Prevention Act (SVPA) in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of a "public purpose" in the context of slum clearance? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the phrase "state of mind" in the definition of a criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the California Civil Code in the context of "Liberal interpretation"? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of "duress" in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of a sexual assault offence in a jury trial? (California, United States of America)
