How have courts interpreted "surrounding provisions" in the California Family Law Act?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., 239 Cal.Rptr.3d 241, 28 Cal.App.5th 635 (Cal. App. 2018):
People v. Hubbard (2016) 63 Cal.4th 378, 388-389, 203 Cal.Rptr.3d 114, 371 P.3d 578 [analyzing statute's "surrounding provisions" to discern legislative intent].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted the provisions of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the provisions of the California Franchise Tax Act and the California Tax Code in the context of the collection and seizure of a taxpayer's property? (California, United States of America)
Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How has section 667.5(b) of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted the 'relative responsibility' provisions in relation to child protection legislation? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
