How has the court considered abuse of discretion in deciding whether or not to allow evidence of abuse of power to be used in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Serv. Agency v. Sandra L. (In re Sandra L.), D058354, Super. Ct. No. MH105007 (Cal. App. 2011):
outweighed its probative value. We review the superior court's rulings on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion. (People v. Harris (2005) 37 Cal.4th 310, 337.) We discern no abuse of discretion in this case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to re-weigh the evidence to determine whether the trial court abused its power to grant an order for an abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
When will a court not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
How will the courts review a trial court's decision to exclude evidence for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of abuse of power in the context of a motion to overturn a finding that the trial court abused power on the Pitchess motion? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have the power to exercise discretion in determining whether to grant relief to a plaintiff in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
