How does proof of general intent meet the general intent requirement for unlawful gun possession?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Noble, F055403 (Cal. App. 7/9/2009), F055403 (Cal. App. 2009):

We rejected the respondent's argument that the general intent requirement regarding unlawful gun possession is satisfied by proof of knowledge. "We agree knowledge plus physical possession may ordinarily demonstrate an intent to exercise dominion and control, but knowledge does not conclusively demonstrate such intent as a matter of law. Otherwise, a felon would be strictly liable for the crime immediately upon finding a firearm, even if found under innocent circumstances." (People v. Jeffers, supra, 41 Cal.App.4th at p. 922.)

Other Questions


Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does a general intent crime require specific intent? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the mental state required for a conviction of a specific intent crime and that of those convicted of a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Is it a federal error that crime requires general not specific intent rather than specific intent? (California, United States of America)
Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have to issue a reversal of a finding of intent under section 11379 of the California Highway Traffic Code where he omitted the specific intent to sell methamphetamine from the relevant inquiry? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court change the charge of simple possession of marijuana to the charged offense of possession of possession for sale? (California, United States of America)
If assault requires the intent to injure the victim, can assault be a specific intent crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant who intentionally commits an intentional unlawful killing without malice is guilty of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and the test required by the Sixth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.