The Appellant argues that the trial judge gave insufficient weight to Great West's warranty exclusion of economic loss. I would adopt the rationale of Ruttan J. in Lightburn v. Belmont Sale, supra, at page 741: I conclude that the defendant was in breach of a fundamental term of the contract to purchase a motor car of workable character, capable of giving a sustained reliable performance throughout the year. The defendants cannot rely upon the exempting clauses and I declare that the plaintiff is entitled to declare the contract void for fundamental breach and to have a rescission thereof.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.