In the context of social science research and socio-economic data, is there any case law supporting the argument that social science and social economic data are not mutually understood?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from M.Y.T.C. v L.H.N., 2018 BCSC 1174 (CanLII):

In Willick v. Willick, 1994 CanLII 28 (SCC), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 670, L’Heureux Dubé J., at para. 16 of the concurring reasons, wrote that “social science research and socio-economic data are long-standing tools in both Canada and United States.”

Other Questions


Is there any case law that supports the argument that the doctrine of common law must be interpreted in the context of the common law context? (British Columbia, Canada)
In the context of water conservation legislation, is there any case law that supports the argument that the land beneath water is not the province's own property? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting the argument of efficiency in the context of a motion to stay the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that "balance" must be considered in the context of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that an expense relates to an extracurricular activity bring the amount of child support under s. 7 of the Child Support Guidelines (e.g. expenses) into s.7 of the child support table? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in the history of the Court of Appeal to support the argument that reason is insufficient to support a claim of reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of social science and psychological science in determining what is in the best interests of a child? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an award of compensatory spousal support be justified by the existence of either an economic disadvantage to the payee spouse or an economic advantage to the Payor spouse? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is spousal support calculated in the context of a long-term relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a radiologist will inevitably conclude that a fracture is present, based on the x-ray, and that the radiologist’s opinion is that the fracture should not have been diagnosed? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.