While this argument has some initial attraction, it is apparent the defendants’ argument of efficiency relies on a conclusion that a stay is compelling and will be successful. This is somewhat circular reasoning, as it in essence requires, at a minimum, a prima facie assessment of the application which is not properly the subject of a sequencing application (see Douez v. Facebook, Inc., 2012 BCSC 2097 at para. 22).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.