[27] Gordon v. Goertz, supra, is also instructive in its emphasis that mobility motions ought not descend into enquiries into the custodial parent’s reason or motive for moving (paragraphs [21]-[22]). Parental conduct, however meritorious or however reprehensible, does not enter the analysis unless it relates to the ability of the parent to meet the needs of the child.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.