Fitzsimmons claims damages for mental distress based either on the parties having contemplated it at the time the employment contract was entered into or because the acts complained of giving rise to mental distress are independently actionable and arise out of the wrongful dismissal itself and thereby aggravating the damages incurred as a result of the dismissal (See Vorvis v. ICBC 1989 CanLII 93 (SCC), 58 D.L.R. (4th) 193 (S.C.C.). There are other cases where damages for mental distress have been awarded without an analysis of the approach taken in Vorvis. Those cases were cited by Fitzsimmons counsel, but I have concluded that the factual circumstances of each are far more serious in their impact on the plaintiffs in those cases than in the case before me.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.