I conclude that damages for mental distress are available where mental suffering is a foreseeable result of a solicitor’s negligence, as discussed in the extract from Campbell v. Ragona quoted above. Mustapha is distinguishable because, unlike the present case, it did not involve a contractual or other relationship that gave rise to a foreseeability of mental distress in the event of a breach.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.