In Smith v. Smith, [2007] O.J. No. 1947, Wildman J. dealt with litigation between two spouses where offers were not in compliance with r. 18. At para. 23, she provided the following guidance: Rule 18 of the Family Law Rules creates a way for litigants to make formal offers to settle their cases and, possibly, to attract some cost benefit by doing so. Offers that do not meet the technical requirements of rule 18 are still valid offers. They may be taken into account in considering costs and they can still, of course, form the basis of a valid contract if accepted by the other side. However, offers that do not comply with rule 18 are governed by the principles of general contract law rather that the special provisions of the Family Law Rules.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.