What constitutes reprehensible conduct in an ex parte application?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Pierce v. Jivraj, 2014 BCSC 926 (CanLII):
Failure to provide full and frank disclosure in an ex parte application may constitute reprehensible conduct. The issue is succinctly set out in Watson v. Slavik, [1996] B.C.J. No. 1885 at para. 12, where Romilly J. stated:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In determining whether to grant a Rule 18A trial on part of a trust application, what is the risk that the findings of the application may be carried over to the subsequent determination of other issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes oppressive conduct and unfairly prejudicial conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the CRT have any authority to award reprehensibly reprehensible conduct damages to a strata corporation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of past contemptuous conduct of the claimant on her application to obtain leave to prevent future contempt applications? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the word “reprehensible” in the context of reprehensible conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a change of circumstance in circumstances arising from an application to cancel or reduce arrears constitute a separate code of conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes reprehensible conduct deserving of rebuke? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can allegations of reprehensible conduct against a lawyer be considered reprehensible? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a police officer's conduct was reprehensible or reprehensible? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is improper conduct improper conduct in the context of a human rights application? (British Columbia, Canada)
