The applicant wife seeks to disqualify Epstein Cole LLP (“the firm”) as solicitors for the respondent husband. The motion engages the test enunciated by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 1990 CanLII 32 (SCC), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249; [1990] S.C.R. 1235, at para. 47 – 48, “that the public, represented by the reasonably-informed person, would be satisfied that no use of confidential information would occur” if the firm continues to represent the respondent.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.