Can Epstein Cole LLP continue as solicitors for the respondent husband?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Guthrie v. Guthrie, 2006 CanLII 31611 (ON SC):

The applicant wife seeks to disqualify Epstein Cole LLP (“the firm”) as solicitors for the respondent husband. The motion engages the test enunciated by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 1990 CanLII 32 (SCC), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249; [1990] S.C.R. 1235, at para. 47 – 48, “that the public, represented by the reasonably-informed person, would be satisfied that no use of confidential information would occur” if the firm continues to represent the respondent.

Other Questions


Is Rule 2.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure applicable to Respondent Respondents to Respondents Respondents? (Ontario, Canada)
When a husband ceases to work when he could be working, when the wife's income is limited by the husband's lack of income, is that husband's absence of work not a bar to a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for impute income to the husband when the husband has retired but the husband's retirement was not voluntary? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there compelling reason to continue the action against individual respondents even if a corporate respondent assumes liability? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the respondent appeal against the findings of guilt on both counts of sexual assault against the respondent? (Ontario, Canada)
In a personal injury action brought by the wife against the husband for child support because of his drug addiction, does the wife rely on the law of drug addiction to argue that the husband's drug addiction would be wrong at law and contrary to public policy? (Ontario, Canada)
When a wife is unable to work because of depression, can she continue to receive an equalization payment from her husband? (Ontario, Canada)
Does solicitor privilege apply to communications between solicitor and client? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a husband responsible for a portion of the wife's costs even if the husband agrees to a consent order? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Respondent have ever been able to continue to work as a full-time employee? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.