In Davis v. Davis, [2004] O.J. No 2256, the court considered a matter in which there was a consent order that represented a compromise of positions by both parties. Accordingly, the court noted that the concept of divided success was more appropriate than the winner/loser approach and concluded that the husband should be responsible, despite divided success in the form of a settlement, for a portion of the wife’s costs. (see paras 3 and 7)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.