It is also important to note that even though the Respondent was diagnosed with prostate cancer in May 2005, he apparently was able to continue to work on a full-time basis and earn significant income from 2005 to 2008 as noted above by Justice Steinberg. The Respondent’s suggestion in his affidavit that his prostate cancer went into remission in the latter part of 2010 and that he had now obtained employment again in 2011 certainly appears to be misleading if he is attempting to suggest to this court that he was not able to work because of his prostate cancer in 2009 in 2010. Simply put, this court is not satisfied with respect to his explanation especially given the unsworn letter from his attending doctor which does not suggest that there was a significant deterioration in his medical condition in 2009 and 2010 and that he was disabled from working because of that. Reid v. Reid 2013 ONSC 1071 (CanLII).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.