The plaintiff relies on Dominguez v. Northland Properties Corporation, 2012 BCSC 328 [Dominguez], in support of the proposition that a statutory remedy will not be considered a reasonably available alternative if the limitation period has expired. Dominguez concerned a proposed class action to recover wages said to be owed to foreign workers. In certifying the case as a class action, Madam Justice Fitzpatrick rejected the argument that employment standards legislation presented a viable alternative to a class action. Among the limitations of the legislation cited by Madam Justice Fitzpatrick, including uncertainty over whether the legislation would address the claims of class members, was the six-month limitation period on filing a complaint, as opposed to the six-year limitation period that governed a breach of contract claim. Madam Justice Fitzpatrick found that the six-month limitation period in the statute would bar many, if not most, of the claims of putative class members.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.