Regardless, I am persuaded by plaintiff’s counsel that, in considering this factor, the court should take into account the position the defendant would have been in had the plaintiff commenced the action shortly before the two year limitation period expired and not, as was the case here, a full year before the limitation deadline: see Erickson Estate v. Burmaster 1990 CanLII 1086 (S.C.) at 4 and 5.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.