In the present case, the impact reports were technical in nature and their contents and conclusions could not readily be assessed without the assistance of those with expertise in the area. Mr. Justice Esson's observation in Eddington v. Surrey (District), supra, is apposite: "No-one could be expected to mount an intelligent response at the public meeting without reasonable prior access to the reports…".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.