In what circumstances will the court consider relevancy of the relevant questions in a case?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Rogers v. Hunter, 1982 CanLII 459 (BC CA):
It had been argued before the chambers judge that the questions were not relevant and it is suggested that the chambers judge seemed to think that relevancy was not an issue on this question in view of the decision of this court in Cominco v. Westinghouse, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a BC Supreme Court case, in what circumstances will the court consider success versus loss of custody? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in New South Wales consider whether an Australian court made a mistake in applying the relevant law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a civil court require a higher degree of probability than it would require for a criminal court to consider whether negligence was established? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant case law and case law relevant to this determination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law relevant to this question? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court consider any new or additional material that counsel have submitted to the Court? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court consider 4 costs considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
When considering a long-term mental health case, is it possible for the court to consider a single clinical record? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the court order that common sense be considered as a factor in determining future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
