Before dealing with the third category of implication in relation to the facts of this case, it is necessary to examine three other areas of the law: (1) the duties placed upon mortgagees in possession when selling the property secured by the mortgage; (2) concurrent liability in tort and contract under the tests set out in Kamloops v. Nielsen, 1984 CanLII 21 (SCC), [1984] 2 S.C.R. 2, and subsequent cases, and (3) the duty to be imposed upon mortgagees when exercising powers under the mortgage, other than mortgagees in possession exercising powers of sale. Duties of Mortgagees in Possession
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.