If not necessary, if not necessary to expedient, is it advantageous to both parties?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R.R.S. v B.R.M.S, 2021 BCSC 1330 (CanLII):
This latter point, that if not necessary in order to be expedient it must be advantageous to both parties, was recently confirmed by our court of appeal in Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204 (“Dosanjh”), as para. 33.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a party recover in restitution where another party has been unjustly enriched at that party's expense? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a vendor who is late in signing a contract with a third party who has been late in entering into the contract, take advantage of the other party's performance? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a motion to have a portion of a ruling regarding party and party costs overturned? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a strata corporation add additional parties to its counterclaim and a third party claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a third party responsible for the costs of a plaintiff who alleges that one of the third parties has failed to draft specifications to clearly state that certain fireproofing is to be asbestos-free? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a party can have challenged a foreign court’s procedural defects in that foreign proceeding, can that party collaterally attack the foreign procedural process before the Canadian court at the enforcement stage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases where a court has considered a party’s contributions to the calculation of the parties’ respective financial contributions in dividing the proceeds of sale? (British Columbia, Canada)
