Where a husband contributes excluded property toward a jointly held asset, the common law presumption of advancement may apply. Due to a quirk of history, the same presumption will not apply where, as here, a similar contribution is made by a wife in favour of a husband. In these circumstances, the outcome must turn on the wife’s intentions. If the wife intended the contribution as a gift, the claim for an exclusion will fail: Donnelly v. Weekley, 2017 BCSC 529.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.