The case law distinguishes between the date of use of an asset and date of contribution towards an asset. An asset only becomes a family asset during the marriage, and so pre-marriage use of an asset is not relevant to the question of whether it was ordinarily used for a family purpose: Bindley v. Muliner, 2001 BCCA 380, leave to appeal refused, [2001] S.C.C.A. No. 479.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.