Does the substantial evidence rule apply to the factual findings of the trial court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from G.P. v. A.P., E054201 (Cal. App. 2012):
both require appellate deference to the trial court's factual findings, particularly where the trial court's findings rest on its assessment of the credibility of witnesses. (Escobar v. Flores, supra, at p. 748 & fn. 6.) Where review of factual findings is called for, we will apply the substantial evidence rule.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing substantial evidence in a motion to overturn a decision of the trial court based upon the absence of substantial evidence to support it? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting the finding that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of the substantial evidence rule on the factual findings of an administrative board's factual findings? (California, United States of America)
When a finding of fact is challenged on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have any power to substitute its conclusions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court defer to the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
